The truth is that evaluation is always bas on criteria, and they necessarily contain two extremes, duality appears: black-white, good-bad, right-wrong, high-low. Inevitably, a game begins in which it is sometimes thick, sometimes empty, sometimes cool, sometimes bad, you are sometimes on top, sometimes at the bottom, sometimes a “king”, sometimes a “nobodies”, sometimes a “queen”, sometimes “somehow flaw”. Such swings/roller coasters are exhausting.
The more we grow our self-esteem
Appraiser, devaluer, under-price, grows and gains strength, which always has 2 sides. Anyone who wants to become the best and the greatest will inevitably face a state of decline, because if we swing the pendulum in one direction, it will inevitably swing in the other. If I value myself highly, praise something in myself, then there are those/that whom/what I value low, criticize behind my back. And at some point in time, my devaluation is guarante to return to me.
This game of pride and bc data mexico inferiority, in which we evaluate and compare ourselves, actually leads to insecurity. Comparison and the attempt to hold ourselves to some good assessment creates a background state of inner critic anxiety that takes away our energy.
Any assessment is carri out in the mind
ad by the mind, and it is always condition by the framework, rules, attitudes, stereotypes transmitt by the family, society, mentality. Consequently, there is no point in endlessly working on self-esteem, since self-esteem is simply an illusion of the mind.
Therefore, it is best inner Windows that adjusts the processor configuration critic to simply leave this game, since there is no chance to win in it: there will always be someone cooler, stronger, etc. We will swing on this swing until we get out of the agb directory process of self-assessment. And the exit from this subconscious program through awareness: “Why am I doing this? What does this give me?”
Self-worth